Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 219
Filter
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(9): 4085-4097, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2322908

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the Computed Tomography (CT) features of pulmonary embolism in patients hospitalized for acute COVID-19 pneumonia and to evaluate the prognostic significance of these features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 110 consecutive patients who were hospitalized for acute COVID-19 pneumonia and underwent pulmonary computed tomography angiography (BTPA) on the basis of clinical suspicion. The diagnosis of COVID-19 infection was determined by CT findings typical of COVID-19 pneumonia and/or a positive result of a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction test. RESULTS: Of the 110 patients, 30 (27.3%) had acute pulmonary embolism and 71 (64.5%) had CT features of chronic pulmonary embolism. Of the 14 (12.7%) patients who died despite receiving therapeutic doses of heparin, 13 (92.9%) had CT features of chronic pulmonary embolism and 1 (7.1%) of acute pulmonary embolism. CT features of chronic pulmonary embolism were more common in deceased patients than in surviving patients (92.9% vs. 60.4%, p=0.01, respectively). Low oxygen saturation and high urine microalbumin creatinine ratio at admission in COVID-19 patients are important determinants of mortality after adjusting for sex and age in logistic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: CT features of chronic pulmonary embolism are common in COVID-19 patients undergoing Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) in the hospital. The coexistence of albuminuria, low oxygen saturation and CT features of chronic pulmonary embolism at admission in COVID-19 patients may herald fatal outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Acute Disease
3.
Neuro Endocrinol Lett ; 44(2): 105-114, 2023 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2319563

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The current retrospective study focused on evaluation of the relationship between pulmonary embolism during COVID-19 pandemic and demographic, presenting symptoms, comorbidities and laboratory results in patients who underwent CT angiography of the pulmonary arteries. METHODS: The study enrolled all adult patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) between March 1, 2020, and April 30, 2022, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. 1698 CTPAs were reviewed and various data were collected. Based on examination results, patients were divided into 4 groups: a group with positive PE and a group with negative PE for both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: When comparing different predictors of COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 patients we noticed lower probability of PE in female gender (OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60-1.00, p = 0.052) and in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients (OR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.38-0.90, p = 0.017). Higher probability of PE was in cases of older age (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02, p < 0.001), increased heart rate (OR 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02, p < 0.001) and increased D-dimer levels (OR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.04, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Considering predictors of PE there was a significantly lower risk of PE in the female gender and COPD, and a higher risk with increasing age, heart rate, and D-dimer levels.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Pulmonary Embolism , Adult , Humans , Female , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology
4.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 67(4): 350-369, 2020.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2293343

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 that has caused an unprecedented pandemic with a high rate of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although most cases are mild, there are a considerable number of patients who develop pneumonia or even acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). After having recovered from the initial disease, many patients continue with various symptoms (fatigue, dry cough, fever, dyspnea, anosmia, and chest pain, among others.), which has led to consider the possible existence of "post-COVID-19 syndrome". Although the definition and validity of this syndrome are not clear yet, several studies report that individuals who have recovered from COVID-19 may have persistent symptoms, radiological abnormalities, and compromised respiratory function. Current evidence suggests that there is a large number of pulmonary sequelae after COVID-19 pneumonia (interstitial thickening, ground glass opacities, crazy paving pattern, and bronchiectasis, among others.). Likewise, it seems that pulmonary function tests (spirometry, DLCO, 6MWT, and measurement of maximum respiratory pressures), in addition to high-resolution computed axial tomographies (CAT scan), are useful for the assessment of these post-COVID-19 pulmonary sequelae. This review aims to describe the possible pulmonary sequelae after COVID-19 pneumonia, as well as to suggest diagnostic procedures for their correct assessment and follow-up; thus, allowing proper management by a multidisciplinary medical team.


COVID-19 es la enfermedad causada por el virus SARS-CoV-2, la cual ha ocasionado una pandemia sin precedentes, con gran cantidad de infectados y muertos en el mundo. Aunque la mayoría de los casos son leves, existe una cantidad considerable de pacientes que desarrollan neumonía o, incluso, síndrome de distrés respiratorio agudo (SDRA). Luego de recuperarse del cuadro inicial, muchos pacientes continúan con diversos síntomas (fatiga, tos seca, fiebre, disnea, anosmia, dolor torácico, entre otras), lo que ha llevado a considerar la posible existencia del "síndrome pos-COVID-19". Aunque la definición y validez de este síndrome aún no son claras, varios estudios reportan que los individuos recuperados de la COVID-19 pueden tener persistencia de síntomas, anormalidades radiológicas y compromiso en la función respiratoria. La evidencia actual sugiere que existe gran cantidad de secuelas pulmonares despues de una neumonía por COVID-19 (engrosamiento intersticial, infiltrado en vidrio esmerilado, patrón en empedrado, bronquiectasias, entre otras.). De igual forma, parece ser que las pruebas de función pulmonar (espirometría, prueba de difusión pulmonar de monóxido de carbono, prueba de caminata de seis minutos y la medición de las presiones respiratorias máximas), además de la tomografía axial computarizada de alta resolución, son útiles para evaluar las secuelas pulmonares pos-COVID-19. En esta revisión se pretende describir las posibles secuelas a nivel pulmonar posteriores a neumonía por COVID-19, así como sugerir procedimientos diagnósticos para su correcta evaluación y seguimiento, que permitan el manejo adecuado por parte de un equipo médico multidisciplinario.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Convalescence , Lung Diseases/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Bronchiectasis/diagnostic imaging , Bronchiectasis/etiology , Bronchiectasis/physiopathology , Disease Progression , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypoxia/blood , Hypoxia/etiology , Hypoxia/physiopathology , Lung Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnostic imaging , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Mental Disorders/etiology , Mental Disorders/physiopathology , Oxygen/blood , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/physiopathology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/physiopathology , Respiratory Function Tests , Spirometry , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
Eur J Radiol ; 163: 110809, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2300326

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate myocardial status through the assessment of extracellular volume (ECV) calculated at computed tomography (CT) in patients hospitalized for novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), with regards to the presence of pulmonary embolism (PE) as a risk factor for cardiac dysfunction. METHOD: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who underwent contrast-enhanced CT at our institution were retrospectively included in this study and grouped with regards to the presence of PE. Unenhanced and portal venous phase scans were used to calculate ECV by placing regions of interest in the myocardial septum and left ventricular blood pool. ECV values were compared between patients with and without PE, and correlations between ECV values and clinical or technical variables were subsequently appraised. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included, 63/94 of whom males (67%), with a median age of 70 (IQR 56-76 years); 28/94 (30%) patients presented with PE. Patients with PE had a higher myocardial ECV than those without (33.5%, IQR 29.4-37.5% versus 29.8%, IQR 25.1-34.0%; p = 0.010). There were no correlations between ECV and patients' age (p = 0.870) or sex (p = 0.122), unenhanced scan voltage (p = 0.822), portal phase scan voltage (p = 0.631), overall radiation dose (p = 0.569), portal phase scan timing (p = 0.460), and contrast agent dose (p = 0.563). CONCLUSIONS: CT-derived ECV could help identify COVID-19 patients at higher risk of cardiac dysfunction, especially when related to PE, to potentially plan a dedicated, patient-tailored clinical approach.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Diseases , Pulmonary Embolism , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Myocardium , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging
6.
Eur Radiol ; 33(7): 4700-4712, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2300234

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequency and pattern of pulmonary vascular abnormalities in the year following COVID-19. METHODS: The study population included 79 patients remaining symptomatic more than 6 months after hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who had been evaluated with dual-energy CT angiography. RESULTS: Morphologic images showed CT features of (a) acute (2/79; 2.5%) and focal chronic (4/79; 5%) PE; and (b) residual post COVID-19 lung infiltration (67/79; 85%). Lung perfusion was abnormal in 69 patients (87.4%). Perfusion abnormalities included (a) perfusion defects of 3 types: patchy defects (n = 60; 76%); areas of non-systematized hypoperfusion (n = 27; 34.2%); and/or PE-type defects (n = 14; 17.7%) seen with (2/14) and without (12/14) endoluminal filling defects; and (b) areas of increased perfusion in 59 patients (74.9%), superimposed on ground-glass opacities (58/59) and vascular tree-in-bud (5/59). PFTs were available in 10 patients with normal perfusion and in 55 patients with abnormal perfusion. The mean values of functional variables did not differ between the two subgroups with a trend toward lower DLCO in patients with abnormal perfusion (74.8 ± 16.7% vs 85.0 ± 8.1). CONCLUSION: Delayed follow-up showed CT features of acute and chronic PE but also two types of perfusion abnormalities suggestive of persistent hypercoagulability as well as unresolved/sequelae of microangiopathy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Despite dramatic resolution of lung abnormalities seen during the acute phase of the disease, acute pulmonary embolism and alterations at the level of lung microcirculation can be identified in patients remaining symptomatic in the year following COVID-19. KEY POINTS: • This study demonstrates newly developed proximal acute PE/thrombosis in the year following SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. • Dual-energy CT lung perfusion identified perfusion defects and areas of increased iodine uptake abnormalities, suggestive of unresolved damage to lung microcirculation. • This study suggests a complementarity between HRCT and spectral imaging for proper understanding of post COVID-19 lung sequelae.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Vascular Diseases , Humans , Computed Tomography Angiography , Pulmonary Circulation , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/blood supply , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging
8.
Vasc Health Risk Manag ; 19: 201-210, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2296778

ABSTRACT

Background: A little is known about the risk factors and predictors of pulmonary embolism (PE) in Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) infected patients. Therefore, we directed this study to investigate the predictors of PE in patients infected with Covid - 19 in Upper Egypt. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 297 patients infected with COVID-19, aged ≥ 18 years old. Suspicion of COVID-19 infection was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and confirmed by nasal and pharyngeal swab for real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. The patient was also determined to have COVID-19 when CT results that were thought to be typical for COVID-19 and clinical data that were compatible were present. Results: PE was diagnosed in 18.2% of patients. We found that the incidence of PE was significantly higher in older patients, females, those with higher BMI, hypertensive patients, diabetics, and patients with co-morbidities. Also, PE was significantly higher in patients presented with dyspnea, chest pain, longer duration of symptoms at hospital admission, and lower oxygen concentration. The mean serum Hb level, platelet count, TLC and absolute lymphocytic count were markedly reduced in those who had PE. All the patients who developed PE had a CO-RADS scale five on their CT chest scan. Age > 65, BMI > 25, DM, and associated co-morbidities were the independent patients' characteristics associated with the development of PE after the multivariate regression analysis. Conclusion: PE is a common complication of Covid 19 infection. PE is associated with a variety of clinical and laboratory parameters in univariate analysis, but age > 65, BMI > 25, DM, and associated co-morbidities were the independent patients' characteristics associated with the development of PE in those infected with Covid-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Female , Humans , Aged , Adolescent , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Egypt/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology
9.
J Med Case Rep ; 17(1): 101, 2023 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2289166

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 was spread worldwide, as a pandemic, from December 2019. Venous thromboembolism events can inflict patients with coronavirus disease 2019 during the hospitalization or convalescent period. Therefore, monitoring of these patients, in terms of venous thromboembolism events signs and symptoms, and timely management of antithrombotic agents are of great importance. CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old Iranian man, who is the first author of this case report, was infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and displayed the typical signs and symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019. Although reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for coronavirus disease 2019, and specific immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, were negative at first, chest computed tomography scan showed the characteristic pattern of lung involvement of a coronavirus disease 2019 infection including bilateral and multilobar ground-glass opacities. At that time, there were no signs or symptoms of deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism, so these were not investigated. About 30 hours after hospital discharge, the patient presented back to the hospital with acute-onset chest pain. We instantly tested his blood for D-dimer, and sent him to take a Doppler sonography of his lower legs and a chest computed tomography angiography in search of pulmonary thromboembolism and deep-vein thrombosis. Although we could confirm pulmonary thromboembolism with computed tomography angiography in our patient, there were no signs or symptoms of venous thromboembolism in his lower legs, and color Doppler sonography of lower limbs was normal. So, the patient was treated with rivaroxaban as an antithrombotic agent. After some days, he was discharged in good condition. About 1 month later, he was referred to our hospital because of left lower limb edema. Although he was under antithrombotic therapy, color Doppler sonography of lower limbs revealed acute deep-vein thrombosis of the left leg. Hence, we decided to shift antithrombotic therapy from rivaroxaban to warfarin, as it is more potent than rivaroxaban in recurrent venous thromboembolism and when taking new oral anticoagulants. Unlike rivaroxaban, which needs no blood test to monitor its efficacy but has a warning for signs and symptoms of bleeding, warfarin therapy must be monitored carefully by regular blood tests for prothrombin time and international normalized ratio to maintain them in the therapeutic range. The patient was informed about the bleeding cautions, and required regular check of prothrombin time and international normalized ratio to maintain them in the proper and advised range of treatment (international normalized ratio therapeutic range 2-3). CONCLUSION: In the case of unexpected recurrent venous thromboembolism in coronavirus disease 2019, especially when patients are taking rivaroxaban or other new oral anticoagulants, such drugs should be substituted by warfarin, with routine follow-up, to maintain the value of prothrombin time and international normalized ratio within the therapeutic range.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Venous Thromboembolism , Venous Thrombosis , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnostic imaging , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Iran , Anticoagulants , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , SARS-CoV-2 , Decision Making
10.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 57(6): 592-598, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2260910

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Assess heterogeneity within patients with resolved COVID-19 to broaden the vision about post-discharge thrombotic cases and postulate possible related mechanisms in search of better anticoagulation guidelines. This study details patients' characteristics, medical history, treatment, and outcomes of readmitted patients with late acute thrombosis through a systematic review of the literature and patients from our academic center database. METHODS: We extracted the records of patients readmitted for venous thrombosis complications after discharge from the database of the first 2000 patients admitted with COVID-19 in our academic center; we also performed a systematic review of the literature using the Medical Subject Headings terms "late thrombosis," "COVID-19," + "venous thrombosis" in PubMed and Google Scholar according to PRISMA guideline. RESULTS: The literature review found 20 patients suitable for review matching the inclusion criteria. These patients were added to those in our database, summing up a total of 26 patients. The median age was 50 years old, 76.9% were male, and most were overweight or had grade 1 obesity (n = 11, 42.3%). None had a previous thrombotic history, but 50% had an underlying comorbidity. Thrombotic events presented on a median of 20 days (range: 4-150 days) from discharge. Pulmonary embolisms occurred in 23 patients (88.46%), deep vein thrombosis in 4, mesenteric thrombosis, and cerebral venous thrombosis in 1, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study found that most patients readmitted for thrombotic events after COVID-19 discharge were middle-aged men with Venous Thrombo Embolism events.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Thrombosis , Venous Thrombosis , Middle Aged , Humans , Male , Female , COVID-19/complications , Patient Readmission , Aftercare , Treatment Outcome , Patient Discharge , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology , Venous Thrombosis/therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Thrombosis/complications , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
11.
Med J Malaysia ; 78(2): 155-162, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2283466

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The co-existence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pulmonary thromboembolic (PTE) disease poses a great clinical challenge. To date, few researches have addressed this important clinical issue among the South-East Asian populations. The objectives of this study were as follow: (1) to describe the clinical characteristics and computed tomographical (CT) features of patients with PTE disease associated with COVID-19 infection and (2) to compare these parameters with those COVID-19 patients without PTE disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study with retrospective record review was conducted in Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah, Selangor, Malaysia. We included all hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection who had undergone CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) examinations for suspected PTE disease between April 2021 and May 2021. Clinical data and laboratory data were extracted by trained data collectors, whilst CT images retrieved were analysed by a senior radiologist. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. RESULTS: We studied 184 COVID-19 patients who were suspected to have PTE disease. CTPA examinations revealed a total of 150 patients (81.5%) suffered from concomitant PTE disease. Among the PTE cohort, the commonest comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (n=78, 52.0%), hypertension (n=66, 44.0%) and dyslipidaemia (n=25, 16.7%). They were generally more ill than the non-PTE cohort as they reported a significantly higher COVID-19 disease category during CTPA examination with p=0.042. Expectedly, their length of both intensive care unit stays (median number of days 8 vs. 3; p=0.021) and hospital stays (median number of days 14.5 vs. 12; p=0.006) were significantly longer. Intriguingly, almost all the subjects had received either therapeutic anticoagulation or thromboprophylactic therapy prior to CTPA examination (n=173, 94.0%). Besides, laboratory data analysis identified a significantly higher peak C-reactive protein (median 124.1 vs. 82.1; p=0.027) and ferritin levels (median 1469 vs. 1229; p=0.024) among them. Evaluation of CT features showed that COVID-19 pneumonia pattern (p<0.001) and pulmonary angiopathy (p<0.001) were significantly more profound among the PTE cohort. To note, the most proximal pulmonary thrombosis was located in the segmental (n=3, 2.0%) and subsegmental pulmonary arteries (n=147, 98.0%). Also, the thrombosis predominantly occurred in bilateral lungs with multilobar involvement (n=95, 63.3%). CONCLUSION: Overall, PTE disease remains prevalent among COVID-19 patients despite timely administration of thromboprophylactic therapy. The presence of hyperinflammatory activities, unique thrombotic locations as well as concurrent pulmonary parenchyma and vasculature aberrations in our PTE cohort implicate immunothrombosis as the principal mechanism of this novel phenomenon. We strongly recommend future researchers to elucidate this important clinical disease among our post- COVID vaccination populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Diseases , Pulmonary Embolism , Thrombosis , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Tertiary Care Centers , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Neovascularization, Pathologic , Pulmonary Circulation , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
12.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0283459, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270007

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing concomitant pulmonary embolism (PE) in COVID-19 patients remains challenging. As such, PE may be overlooked. We compared the diagnostic yield of systematic PE-screening based on the YEARS-algorithm to PE-screening based on clinical gestalt in emergency department (ED) patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We included all ED patients who were admitted because of COVID-19 between March 2020 and February 2021. Patients already receiving anticoagulant treatment were excluded. Up to April 7, 2020, the decision to perform CT-pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was based on physician's clinical gestalt (clinical gestalt cohort). From April 7 onwards, systematic PE-screening was performed by CTPA if D-dimer level was ≥1000 ug/L, or ≥500 ug/L in case of ≥1 YEARS-item (systematic screening cohort). RESULTS: 1095 ED patients with COVID-19 were admitted. After applying exclusion criteria, 289 were included in the clinical gestalt and 574 in the systematic screening cohort. The number of PE diagnoses was significantly higher in the systematic screening cohort compared to the clinical gestalt cohort: 8.2% vs. 1.0% (3/289 vs. 47/574; p<0.001), even after adjustment for differences in patient characteristics (adjusted OR 8.45 (95%CI 2.61-27.42, p<0.001) for PE diagnosis). In multivariate analysis, D-dimer (OR 1.09 per 1000 µg/L increase, 95%CI 1.06-1.13, p<0.001) and CRP >100 mg/L (OR 2.78, 95%CI 1.37-5.66, p = 0.005) were independently associated with PE. CONCLUSION: In ED patients with COVID-19, the number of PE diagnosis was significantly higher in the cohort that underwent systematic PE screening based on the YEARS-algorithm in comparison with the clinical gestalt cohort, with a number needed to test of 7.1 CTPAs to detect one PE.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Patients , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Emergency Service, Hospital , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Testing
14.
Clin Nucl Med ; 48(5): e239-e243, 2023 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2191207

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Although COVID-19 infection is associated with the increased risk of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), COVID-19 pulmonary lesions cause ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) patterns other than PTE. Although extensive research has been done to address different anatomical patterns of COVID-19, there is a knowledge gap in terms of V/Q lung scintigraphy in these patients. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate these patterns and to show how important it is to use SPECT/CT in addition to planar images to differentiate between these patterns from PTE. In the current collection, we presented various patterns of V/Q SPECT/CT abnormalities in COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Humans , Ventilation-Perfusion Scan , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methods , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Ventilation-Perfusion Ratio , Perfusion
16.
Am J Med Sci ; 361(5): 646-649, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2129825

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 virus, or COVID-19, is responsible for the current global pandemic and has resulted in the death of over 400,000 in the United States. Rates of venous thromboembolism have been noted to be much higher in those infected with COVID-19. Here we report a case-series of COVID-19 patients with diverse presentations of pulmonary embolism (PE). We also briefly describe the pathophysiology and mechanisms for pulmonary embolism in COVID-19. These cases indicate a need to maintain a high index of suspicion for PE in patients with COVID-19, as well as the need to consider occult COVID-19 infection in patients with PE in the right clinical circumstance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , SARS-CoV-2 , Acute Disease , Adult , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/physiopathology , United States/epidemiology
17.
Respir Res ; 23(1): 296, 2022 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2098345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant treatment is recommended for at least three months after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but the persistent pulmonary clot burden after that time is unknown. METHODS: Lung perfusion was assessed by ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) SPECT/CT in 20 consecutive patients with SARS-CoV-2-associated acute PE after a minimum of three months anticoagulation therapy in a retrospective observational study. RESULTS: Remaining perfusion defects after a median treatment period of six months were observed in only two patients. All patients (13 men, seven women, mean age 55.6 ± 14.5 years) were on non-vitamin K direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). No recurrent venous thromboembolism or anticoagulant-related bleeding complications were observed. Among patients with partial clinical recovery, high-risk PE and persistent pulmonary infiltrates were significantly more frequent (p < 0.001, respectively). INTERPRETATION: Temporary DOAC treatment seems to be safe and efficacious for resolving pulmonary clot burden in SARS-CoV-2-associated acute PE. Partial clinical recovery is more likely caused by prolonged SARS-CoV-2-related parenchymal lung damage rather than by persistent pulmonary perfusion defects.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Male , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Acute Disease , Perfusion
18.
Clin Nucl Med ; 48(1): 8-17, 2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2087929

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Invented and first approved for clinical use in Australia 36 years ago, Technegas is the technology that enabled ventilation scintigraphy with 99m Tc-labeled carbon nanoparticles ( 99m Tc-CNP). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has considered this technology for more than 30 years but only now is getting close to approving it. Meanwhile, more than 4.4 million patients benefited from this technology in 64 countries worldwide. The primary application of 99m Tc-CNP ventilation imaging is the diagnostic evaluation for suspicion of pulmonary embolism using ventilation-perfusion quotient (V/Q) imaging. Because of 99m Tc-CNP's long pulmonary residence, tomographic imaging emerged as the preferred V/Q methodology. The FDA-approved ventilation imaging agents are primarily suitable for planar imaging, which is less sensitive. After the FDA approval of Technegas, the US practice will likely shift to tomographic V/Q. The 99m Tc-CNP use is of particular interest in the COVID-19 pandemic because it offers an option of a dry radioaerosol that takes approximately only 3 to 5 tidal breaths, allowing the shortest exposure to and contact with possibly infected patients. Indeed, countries where 99m Tc-CNP was approved for clinical use continued using it throughout the COVID-19 pandemic without known negative viral transmission consequences. Conversely, the ventilation imaging was halted in most US facilities from the beginning of the pandemic. This review is intended to familiarize the US clinical nuclear medicine community with the basic science of 99m Tc-CNP ventilation imaging and its clinical applications, including common artifacts and interpretation criteria for tomographic V/Q imaging for pulmonary embolism.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Humans , Carbon , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Lung , Pandemics , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Ventilation , Radionuclide Imaging , Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets , Technetium , Ventilation-Perfusion Ratio , Nanostructures
20.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(9): e1574-e1575, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2032203
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL